John a t robinson redating the new testament
We have some reason to believe that Paul was put to death in the Neronian persecution of A. 64, which means the Book of Acts was composed before this time. This evidence leads us to believe that the first three Gospels were all composed within thirty years from the time these events occurred, a time when unfriendly eyewitnesses were still living who could contradict their testimony if it was not accurate. 80 date might be questioned when it comes to the Gospel of John. There is strong tradition John wrote Revelation there at that time. The evidence points out that: 1) the documents were not written long after the events but within close proximity to them, and 2) they were written by people during the period when many who were acquainted with the facts or were eyewitnesses to them were still living. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? This type of evidence has recently led one liberal scholar, John A. Robinson, to re-date the New Testament documents much earlier than most modern liberal scholars would have us believe. Albright, the great biblical archaeologist, to comment, “We can already say emphatically that there is no longer any solid basis for dating any book of the New Testament after A. 80, two full generations before the date between 130 and 150 given by the more radical New Testament critics of today” (William F. There is a strong possibility the apostle John’s banishment to Patmos under Domitian was as late as A. This is testified to by Clement of Alexandria, Eusebius, and Irenaeus (cf. The inescapable conclusion is that the New Testament picture of Christ can be trusted. There are a limited number of more or less fixed points, and between them phenomena to be accounted for are strung along at intervals like beads on a string according to the supposed requirements of dependence, diffusion and development.New absolute dates will force reconsideration of relative dates, and the intervals will contract or expand with the years available.For, much more than is generally recognized, the chronology of the New Testament rests on presuppositions rather than facts.It is not that in this case new facts have appeared, new absolute datings which cannot be contested – they are still extraordinarily scarce.
He was a lecturer at Trinity College, Cambridge, and later Dean of Trinity College until his death in 1983 from cancer.
Robinson was considered a major force in shaping liberal Christian theology.
Along with Harvard theologian Harvey Cox, he spearheaded the field of secular theology and, like William Barclay, he was a believer in universal salvation.
older) direction, and that from about 2000 BC backwards the magnitude of the correction rose steeply, necessitating adjustments of up to 1000 years.
The effect of this was not merely to shift all the dates back once more: it was to introduce a fundamental change in the pattern of relationships, making it impossible for the supposed diffusion to have taken place.
Search for john a t robinson redating the new testament:
In the process long-held assumptions about the pattern of dependence, diffusion and development may be upset, and patterns that the textbooks have taken for granted become subjected to radical questioning.